Clash Royale Royal Hogs vs 17-elixir defense: Who will win?? |
- Royal Hogs vs 17-elixir defense: Who will win??
- Tie breaker, surely I should have won?
- Brawl Stars responds Surge to f3. I am currently being affected by the automoderator, so if you like the series, please support the future posts by checking my newest posts. Let the games continue!
- Chess! r/BrawlStars vs r/ClashRoyale! The first move was 1.e4. Clash Royale to move, the most popular move in the replies will be chosen.
- I was scrolling trough top post ever and saw this sad post, I decided to check out 4 years later and found some amazing news if true.
- I present to you the most useless offer in cr
- Hey! It might not seem very impressive but I finally reached 6300 for the first time I’m so happy
- Voluptuous
- Hog Rider takes a u-turn at the last possible moment
- MVP Princess
- I just beat double royal hogs in touchdown and I am very proud, I don’t know how it happened but it was a huge clutch
- Brawl Stars has responded with Kingside Castle! Clash Royales turn. You guys keep up the pace!
- The Iceberg of the Supercell universe
- He knows something we don’t
- Risking massive downvote here but i genuinely dont care that a deck require skill or not, you're not going to be a rocket science in the future if you play a deck that require a bit skill
- Idea: allow to request more than one card in a trade if you offered to give less than 4 cards
- Predictive fireball for magic archer
- Tv Royale soon!
- I made a CR-based Team Deathmatch game in Minecraft! (full showcase w/ new classes: Witch and Fisherman)
- Golem Clone = Fair
- If Common Books are worth 500 gems, then why do we only get 100?
- Bubble gum does more damage than spears in clash royale. Logic.
- The REAL complaint that all the "no-skill" accusations are coming from
Royal Hogs vs 17-elixir defense: Who will win?? Posted: 01 Jun 2021 07:39 AM PDT
| ||
Tie breaker, surely I should have won? Posted: 01 Jun 2021 02:22 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 04:56 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 11:14 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 02:20 PM PDT
| ||
I present to you the most useless offer in cr Posted: 01 Jun 2021 03:17 AM PDT
| ||
Hey! It might not seem very impressive but I finally reached 6300 for the first time I’m so happy Posted: 01 Jun 2021 05:19 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 06:42 AM PDT
| ||
Hog Rider takes a u-turn at the last possible moment Posted: 01 Jun 2021 11:29 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 04:45 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 01:51 PM PDT
| ||
Brawl Stars has responded with Kingside Castle! Clash Royales turn. You guys keep up the pace! Posted: 01 Jun 2021 06:51 PM PDT
| ||
The Iceberg of the Supercell universe Posted: 31 May 2021 11:36 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 09:16 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 12:28 AM PDT Like is it an issue that i dont want to sacrifice my fun time in the game for playing decks that i dont enjoy or im not comfort with? Since i started the game there was always one thing that i never understood why ppls complain about, every day i see ppls spread hates toward players who play decks like golem, balloon etc. Their logic is that your deck dosent require skill so either you should not play it or you're a dumb ass noob.. i mean is it really that matter and its an unwritten rule that everyone must not play easy decks? i havent been in reddit and havent played the game long enough to understand this logic so it would be nice if someone explain to me that why this whole toxicity toward playing easy decks happen.. thanks in advance [link] [comments] | ||
Idea: allow to request more than one card in a trade if you offered to give less than 4 cards Posted: 01 Jun 2021 08:43 AM PDT
| ||
Predictive fireball for magic archer Posted: 01 Jun 2021 05:38 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 08:34 AM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 03:47 PM PDT
| ||
Posted: 01 Jun 2021 03:38 PM PDT
| ||
If Common Books are worth 500 gems, then why do we only get 100? Posted: 01 Jun 2021 10:26 AM PDT
| ||
Bubble gum does more damage than spears in clash royale. Logic. Posted: 01 Jun 2021 01:39 PM PDT | ||
The REAL complaint that all the "no-skill" accusations are coming from Posted: 01 Jun 2021 07:59 AM PDT The biggest thing that's causing all of these accusations about decks being no skill is actually about matchups being no skill, not the decks themselves. Take, for example, 3.0 X-Bow vs 2.6 Hog EQ. There is literally nothing the X-Bow player can do to outplay the Knight-EQ-Log defense that the Hog EQ player can spam mindlessly into the X-Bow player, and so this matchup makes Hog EQ seem like it is no skill due to the spell cycle nature of this matchup, with it being 100 times easier for Hog EQ. Or take 3.5 Icebow vs Recruits Bait. There is literally nothing the icebow player can do to take out the flying machine, so all the recruits player has to do is spam into the icebow player, making the matchup seem low skill to the icebow player because all the recruits player has to do (and which is indeed the correct way to play the matchup from the perspective of the recruits player) is just mindlessly spam recruits pigs fm into the icebow player. I'm beating a dead horse here, but again take 3.0 X-Bow vs Golem Clone. X-Bow, missing the Ice Golem and having no splash to counterbalance for that, only has the Ice Spirit, Log, and Fireball to deal with those massive swarms, because Golem Clone always runs arrows. Unless X-Bow takes a tower in single, the X-Bow player will lose, and even full turtling from the X-Bow player will not stop 700 damage or so from getting on their towers after each Golem Clone push. It is literally just mindless spam from the golem clone player to win the matchup. The greatest problem with the game is not any of the decks and such inside it. It is more of the RPS nature of the game, where some totally unbalanced matchups require 0 skill for the advantaged player to win. [link] [comments] |
You are subscribed to email updates from Clash Royale: A Most Ridiculous Duel!. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States |
No comments:
Post a Comment